2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)

★★★★ — 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)

Share
Film poster for 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)

Released in 1968 and running to just under two and a half hours, 2001: A Space Odyssey is one of those films that arrives with the full weight of cinematic history already pressing down on it before you've even pressed play. A joint production between Stanley Kubrick's own production company and Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, the film takes as its premise the discovery of a mysterious object beneath the lunar surface and the subsequent mission, assisted by an advanced artificial intelligence called HAL 9000, to trace its origins. It is science fiction in the broadest philosophical sense, less concerned with action or plot mechanics than with questions about human evolution, consciousness, and our place in a universe that doesn't especially care we exist. Its cultural footprint is enormous: the HAL 9000 voice, the rotating space station, the final act's hallucinatory light-show sequence, all of these have been quoted, spoofed, and referenced so many times that watching the original can feel like encountering a parent you already know through their children.

Kubrick by 1968 had already demonstrated he was a filmmaker with range and an uncompromising eye for formal precision. His earlier work in crime (you can read my thoughts on The Killing) showed a director with a firm grip on structure and atmosphere, and the years between that and 2001 only sharpened those instincts. Here he worked from a screenplay co-written with science fiction author Arthur C. Clarke, adapting Clarke's own short story "The Sentinel" into something considerably more expansive and abstract. The production was meticulous to the point of obsession, with camera techniques and set designs that still hold up visually more than fifty years on. The film was shot primarily at MGM-British Studios in England, which accounts for its British production credit alongside its American studio backing.

The cast is relatively spare by design. Keir Dullea and Gary Lockwood play the two astronauts at the centre of the mission, performances that are intentionally flat and affectless, human beings made to seem almost as mechanical as the ship around them. William Sylvester appears in the film's earlier section as a scientist grappling with the implications of what has been found. And then there is Douglas Rain, who never appears on screen at all but whose voice work as HAL 9000 is, in many respects, the film's most vivid performance: polished but unsettling, helpful but hollow. Daniel Richter, a mime artist and choreographer, leads the wordless early sequence set at the dawn of human prehistory, a section that demands physical rather than verbal performance and gets it. It is a film that trusts its images more than its dialogue, which is either a strength or a frustration depending on what you're after on a given evening.

I get it. I really do. There was a time where I had this on a pedestal as an untouchable masterpiece. And in many ways, it still is. It’s an art piece more than a film. The atmosphere, the pacing (or lack of it), the ambiguity, it’s all deliberate. It’s philosophical, visually stunning, and HAL remains one of the most chillingly calm villains in cinema history. That voice alone is pure menace. I love the themes it tackles, the evolution of mankind, artificial intelligence, cosmic insignificance... the stuff that sparks a dozen pub debates. But here's the thing: it doesn’t quite hold up in the same way it once did. It’s slow, painfully slow at times. There are sequences that drag long after they’ve made their point. It could’ve been trimmed by an hour and lost none of its brilliance. Still, I’ll never fault it for ambition. It's a film that aimed for the stars, literally and figuratively. A milestone in cinema, just a little dulled by time.

I find myself in much the same place these days, if I'm honest. There's a version of this film I carry around in my head that feels perfect, and then there's the one you actually sit with for nearly two and a half hours, and the gap between those two things has grown wider with each rewatch. The comparison that keeps coming to mind is with other meditative, image-driven films from the same era, including some I've covered here like Persona and Winter Light, where the slowness feels load-bearing rather than self-indulgent. With 2001, I'm less convinced every minute earns its place. The ambition is real, the achievement is real, but so is the drag. A landmark, yes. An uncomplicated pleasure, no.


Rating: ★★★★  | Year: 1968  | Watched: 2025-04-10

View on Letterboxd →


Trailer

▶ Watch the official trailer for 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) on YouTube


Where to watch

Watch in the UK
Stream: HBO Max Amazon Channel
Rent: Apple TV Store · Rakuten TV · Amazon Video · Google Play Movies
Buy: Apple TV Store · Rakuten TV · Amazon Video · Google Play Movies
Physical: Amazon UK · Zavvi

Watch in the US
Stream: HBO Max Amazon Channel · YouTube TV · HBO Max
Rent: Amazon Video · Apple TV Store · Google Play Movies · YouTube
Buy: Amazon Video · Apple TV Store · Google Play Movies · YouTube
Physical: Amazon US

Affiliate disclosure: Movies With Macca may earn a small commission on purchases or subscriptions started via these links. It costs you nothing extra.


Related on Movies With Macca

More from Stanley Kubrick: The Killing (1956) · The Shining (1980) · Killer's Kiss (1955)
More from United Kingdom: Lessons of Darkness (1992) · Shinjuku Boys (1995) · The Curse of Frankenstein (1957) · Blue (1993)
More from the 1960s: Viy (1967) · Persona (1966) · Carnival of Souls (1962) · Daisies (1966)
More science fiction: Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956) · Fantastic Planet (1973) · Nightmare City (1980) · The Long Walk (2025)
More mystery: Mononoke the Movie: The Phantom in the Rain (2024) · Mononoke the Movie: Chapter II - The Ashes of Rage (2025) · Carnival of Souls (1962) · One Way or Another (1975)

Film images and data courtesy of TMDB. This product uses the TMDB API but is not endorsed or certified by TMDB.