Stargate (1994)

★★★½ — Stargate (1994)

Share
Film poster for Stargate (1994)

Stargate arrived in cinemas in the summer of 1994, a period when big-budget science fiction spectacle was very much back in fashion. The premise, co-written by director Roland Emmerich and his long-time producing partner Dean Devlin, takes genuine archaeological mystery as its starting point: an enormous, ancient device unearthed near Giza turns out to be a portal to another world, one populated by people who look remarkably like ancient Egyptians and who live under the shadow of a god-like being called Ra. It was a concept that tapped into a wider cultural fascination with alternative histories of antiquity, the kind of questions that fill late-night documentaries and dog-eared paperbacks in charity shops. That the film manages to build a coherent action-adventure around those ideas, rather than simply gesturing at them, is no small thing.

Emmerich was still finding his footing as a large-scale Hollywood director at this point, working with a co-production setup that brought together American studio muscle (including Carolco Pictures, then in its final days) and European financing through Le Studio Canal+. His instinct for scale and spectacle was already clear, something he would go on to deploy at even greater size in Independence Day, made just two years later. For Stargate, though, the world-building earns at least as much attention as the set pieces: the production design leans hard into Egyptian iconography and manages to make it feel genuinely alien rather than merely decorative. James Spader leads as Dr Daniel Jackson, a linguist and Egyptologist whose outsider academic status makes him the audience's way into the story. Spader had already demonstrated real range by the time this came around, having turned heads in considerably quieter material such as sex, lies, and videotape, and he brings a nervy, slightly awkward intelligence to Jackson that keeps things grounded when the film threatens to tip into pure bombast. Opposite him, Kurt Russell plays Colonel Jack O'Neil, a soldier carrying considerable personal grief, and Russell does what Russell does best: credible physicality, economical line readings, and a quiet authority that makes you believe someone would actually follow him through a portal to another galaxy. Jaye Davidson, fresh from considerable attention following The Crying Game, takes on the role of Ra, and brings an unsettling, hieratic stillness to the part that suits it well. Viveca Lindfors and Alexis Cruz round out a cast that handles the material with more seriousness than the premise might have seemed to demand.

The film runs to just over two hours and was a considerable box-office success on release, spawning a long-running television franchise that kept the setting alive well into the 2000s. As a standalone piece, though, it belongs firmly to that particular strand of polished but unremarkable-sounding 1990s science fiction that, on closer inspection, turns out to have rather more going for it than its reputation sometimes suggests. It sits comfortably alongside other action films from the era, though it has a thoughtfulness about ancient history that separates it from the straightforward genre fare of the period (for a sense of how the decade's action output varied, The Fifth Element (1997) and Anaconda offer very different points of comparison from the same era).

Brilliant because of the fact that it's totally believable in my opinion. Egyptology fascinates me and I think there is so much about the ancient world we dont know. The movie itself is incredibly impressive considering its 1994. The special effects wouldn't be far out of place today. The music is brilliant. It's just an all around great little 90s classic. Also Kurt Russell is awesome

And that point about the special effects really does hold up when you go back and watch it now. There are moments in this film that wouldn't embarrass a production made a decade later, which speaks to genuine craft on the part of the crew rather than just money being thrown at the screen. The Egyptology angle is what keeps pulling me back to it, honestly. There is something about the way the film takes those open questions around ancient history and treats them as genuinely worth exploring, rather than just window dressing for the action, that gives it a staying power a lot of its contemporaries lack. Kurt Russell being Kurt Russell is, as ever, reason enough on its own. Some films just earn their classic status the honest way.


Rating: ★★★½  | Year: 1994  | Watched: 2025-06-27

View on Letterboxd →


Trailer

▶ Watch the official trailer for Stargate (1994) on YouTube


Where to watch

Watch in the UK
Stream: Amazon Prime Video · Amazon Prime Video with Ads
Rent: Apple TV Store · Amazon Video · Google Play Movies · Sky Store
Buy: Apple TV Store · Amazon Video · Google Play Movies · Sky Store
Physical: Amazon UK · Zavvi

Watch in the US
Stream: Amazon Prime Video · Amazon Prime Video with Ads
Rent: Amazon Video · Apple TV Store · Google Play Movies · YouTube
Buy: Amazon Video · Apple TV Store · Google Play Movies · YouTube
Physical: Amazon US

Affiliate disclosure: Movies With Macca may earn a small commission on purchases or subscriptions started via these links. It costs you nothing extra.


Related on Movies With Macca

More from Roland Emmerich: Independence Day (1996)
More with James Spader: sex, lies, and videotape (1989)
More from France: Fantastic Planet (1973) · Letter from Siberia (1957) · Lessons of Darkness (1992) · Here and Elsewhere (1976)
More from the 1990s: Lessons of Darkness (1992) · Shinjuku Boys (1995) · Blue (1993) · Cemetery Man (1994)
More action: A Better Tomorrow (1986) · The General (1926) · Hand of Death (1976) · Daredevil (2003)
More adventure: Alice in Wonderland (1951) · The Eagle (1925) · Louisiana Story (1948) · The General (1926)

Film images and data courtesy of TMDB. This product uses the TMDB API but is not endorsed or certified by TMDB.