Hash Import 2026 05 18 12 34

Vampyr (1932)

★★ — Vampyr (1932)

Carl Theodor Dreyer made Vampyr immediately after the critical triumph of La Passion de Jeanne d'Arc (1928), though that earlier film had been a commercial disappointment serious enough to make financing his next project genuinely difficult. Vampyr was eventually funded in large part by its own lead actor, the French-Russian aristocrat Nicolas de Gunzburg, who performed under the pseudonym Julian West as a condition of his backing. Produced as a Franco-German co-production through Tobis Filmkunst, it loosely adapts Sheridan Le Fanu's short story collection In a Glass Darkly (1872), drawing most heavily on the story "Carmilla." The shoot took place partly on location in Courtempierre, France, and Dreyer shot much of the film in diffused, gauze-filtered light, a deliberate technical choice rather than a post-production effect.

Vampyr (1932), Carl Theodor Dreyer's dreamlike foray into horror, is historically significant (often cited as one of the earliest sound-era horror films and a visual precursor to the genre's poetic side). Shot in an ethereal, mist-drenched style with haunting use of shadows and negative imagery, it clearly aims for atmosphere over shock. The premise (a wanderer arriving in a cursed village plagued by a vampire) has potential, and Dreyer's painterly compositions occasionally mesmerize. But nearly a century later, Vampyr feels less like a film and more like a museum piece you're expected to admire rather than enjoy. The transition to sound was clearly awkward: dialogue is sparse to nonexistent (much is conveyed via intertitle-like text), leaving long stretches of near-silence punctuated by creaking doors and distant whispers that now feel less eerie than unintentionally comical. The pacing is slow despite it's short runtime, the narrative opaque to the point of confusion, and the minimal script offers little emotional anchor. What was once avant-garde now reads as alienating. It's not without merit, and cinephiles will rightly praise its visual daring. But as a viewing experience? It's nearly inaccessible, ponderous, and shows its age mercilessly. A film to study, perhaps, but not one to savor. Some classics earn reverence; this one earns a respectful nod before you reach for the remote. There are countless better Vampire films.

Rating: ★★ | Year: 1932 | Watched: 2026-03-11

View on Letterboxd →

Where to watch (UK)

Rent: Amazon Video
Buy: Amazon Video
Physical: Amazon UK

Affiliate disclosure: Movies With Macca may earn a small commission on purchases or subscriptions started via these links. It costs you nothing extra.

Related on Movies With Macca

Vampyr (1932)

Read more

Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956)

Fantastic Planet (1973)

Viy (1967)

Alice in Wonderland (1951)