The Smiling Madame Beudet (1923)

Let me be straight with you: I respect The Smiling Madame Beudet far more than I enjoyed it. And I'm not entirely comfortable saying that, because director Germaine Dulac was doing something genuinely remarkable in 1923. A film centred on a woman's suffocating marriage, her rich fantasy life, her quiet psychological revolt against a bullying husband who treats their home like his personal stage, all filtered through superimpositions and impressionist visual poetry. Radical doesn't cover it. This was a feminist work decades before that word entered mainstream critical conversation. I know all of that. I just found it very hard going.

The intentions here are admirable. The use of superimpositions to externalise Madame Beudet's inner world, her daydreams bleeding into the drab reality of bourgeois domesticity, is inventive in a way that still reads as creative rather than merely quaint. The critique embedded in the film's structure, the way her imagination is vivid and expansive while her actual life is cramped and grey, carries a genuine argument. Dulac understood that form and content could reinforce each other, and that's not nothing. That's actually quite a lot.

But sitting with it as a viewing experience in the present day? It's a struggle, and I don't think pretending otherwise serves anyone. The acting is the first hurdle. I know, I know, exaggerated pantomime performance was the idiom of the era, and you have to meet silent cinema where it lives. I've managed it elsewhere. I loved The General and found it completely alive, and The Cameraman holds up beautifully. Silent performance, at its best, transcends the silence. Here, though, the heightened gestures feel alienating rather than expressive, pulling me out of the emotional truth the film is trying to establish rather than drawing me in.

Then there's the pacing. The film runs under an hour, and it still drags. The narrative is thin even measured against contemporaries, and without the rhythm of dialogue or the momentum of modern editing to carry you across the century-long gap, the connective tissue goes slack. The camera work is occasionally inventive, some of those superimposition sequences genuinely catch the eye, but too often it's static and stage-bound, the compositions rooted to the spot in a way that doesn't invite you to lean forward.

None of this is a criticism of Dulac's ambitions or her place in history. It's more an honest account of what watching the film actually felt like. Some films survive their era so completely that the distance collapses and you're just watching something alive. This one doesn't quite make that crossing, at least not for me. Engaging with it fully requires a patience that I suspect most casual viewers, myself included on a bad day, simply don't have reserves of.

What I keep coming back to is the distinction between studying a film and experiencing it. The Smiling Madame Beudet is worth studying. Its influence on feminist and avant-garde filmmaking is real, and understanding where certain ideas came from matters. But study and enjoyment aren't the same thing, and I think it's worth being honest about that gap rather than dressing reverence up as pleasure.

Some films earn their reputation through legacy alone. This is one of them. Important, groundbreaking, and, for me at least, genuinely difficult to sit with. One and a half stars.

Rating: ★½  | Year: 1923  | Watched: 2026-03-17

View on Letterboxd →

Where to watch

Watch in the US
Physical: Amazon US

Affiliate disclosure: Movies With Macca may earn a small commission on purchases or subscriptions started via these links. It costs you nothing extra.

Related on Movies With Macca

More from France: Fantastic Planet (1973) · Letter from Siberia (1957) · Lessons of Darkness (1992) · Here and Elsewhere (1976)
More from the 1920s: The Eagle (1925) · The General (1926) · The Docks of New York (1928) · A Throw of Dice (1929)
More drama: Viy (1967) · Wonder (2017) · A Better Tomorrow (1986) · Beautiful Boy (2018)