In the Sky's Wild Noise (1983)

There's a moment watching In the Sky's Wild Noise where you become acutely aware of two things happening at once: something genuinely powerful is being said, and you can barely see or hear it properly. That tension, between the film's evident ambition and the wretched state of the only version available to watch, defines the entire experience. It's frustrating in a way that feels almost personal.

This is my A-Z World Movie Tour stop for Guyana, and I'll be honest, I wasn't sure what I was walking into. What I found was a film built around the intellectual force of Walter Rodney, whose monologue here is sharp, commanding and genuinely eloquent. He weaves theory and practice together with the kind of clarity that makes you sit up straighter. The themes he's working through, resistance, resilience, the sheer accumulated weight of history on a people and a place, land with quiet but real power. When the film is firing, you can feel that it means something. The language is poetic without being self-indulgent, and the delivery has a deliberateness to it that commands attention.

But then there's the transfer. Good grief, the transfer. Watching this felt like squinting through a sandstorm for the better part of an hour. The murky resolution, the inconsistent clarity, the grain that swallows whole scenes whole. There were moments where I genuinely wasn't sure if I was watching a film or attempting to decode hieroglyphics on a VHS cassette that had been stored in someone's shed since 1992. It shouldn't matter this much, and yet it absolutely does, because cinema is a visual medium and when the visuals are this compromised, everything suffers.

The cruelty of it is that you can tell the imagery is supposed to carry weight. There are scenes that should feel urgent and visceral, and in theory the visual language is doing something potent. But the graininess and dim resolution sap that impact almost entirely. It's like being handed a treasure map written in invisible ink. You know something valuable is buried here. You just can't find your way to it. Rodney's words give you enough to hold onto, but engagement starts to feel like labour rather than discovery, and that's not a place you want your audience to be.

I kept thinking of Sugar Cane Alley, another 1983 film grappling with Caribbean history and the legacy of colonialism, but one where the craft is right there on screen, fully legible and hitting you square in the chest. The comparison isn't entirely fair given the very different contexts and budgets, but it does illustrate how much the viewing experience shapes the emotional one.

So is it worth your time? That depends on who you are. If you're already invested in the history, the politics, the specific gravity of what Rodney represents, then yes, you'll find something here worth the effort and the squinting. The ideas are strong enough to survive the presentation, just about. But if you're approaching this as a casual viewer hoping to be pulled in by the film itself rather than arriving with prior commitment to the subject matter, I'd struggle to recommend it without a significant caveat. The rough edges aren't just aesthetic quirks, they're real barriers.

A film that deserves a better life than the one it's currently living on screen. One and a half stars.

Rating: ★½  | Year: 1983  | Watched: 2025-06-26

View on Letterboxd →

Related on Movies With Macca

More from the 1980s: Nightmare City (1980) · A Better Tomorrow (1986) · Style Wars (1983) · Garlic Is as Good as Ten Mothers (1980)