Dunkirk (2017)

Share
Dunkirk (2017)

Few moments in modern British history carry the weight of Dunkirk. Between the 26th of May and the 4th of June 1940, over 330,000 Allied soldiers, British, French, Belgian and Canadian, were lifted from the beaches and harbour of a small French port town by a combination of Royal Navy vessels and a remarkable flotilla of civilian boats. The men had been pushed back to the coast by a rapid German advance, and the evacuation, codenamed Operation Dynamo, became one of the defining episodes of the Second World War: a military retreat reframed, almost defiantly, as a kind of national salvation. It has been depicted on screen before, most notably in Leslie Norman's solid 1958 production, but it had never, before 2017, received quite this level of spectacle or this level of scrutiny.

Christopher Nolan, working from his own original screenplay, is a director who has spent his career playing with time, structure and audience expectation. From the fractured chronology of Memento to the layered architecture of Inception, he has consistently been drawn to stories that work against a conventional linear grain. Dunkirk is, in that sense, a very Nolan film: it splits its narrative into three strands operating across different timeframes, one covering a week on the beach, one a single day at sea, and one a single hour in the air, before folding them together. Produced through his regular company Syncopy in partnership with Warner Bros. and RatPac Entertainment, it was shot largely on location at the actual beaches of Dunkirk, supplementing the contemporary coastline with practical period vessels and real airworthy Spitfires. The budget, estimated at around 100 million dollars, is notably modest by the standards of modern spectacle filmmaking, and the decision to favour practical photography over digital effects is evident throughout. Hans Zimmer's score, built around a ticking metronome and swelling strings, functions almost as a fourth character in the film, relentless and deliberately unsettling. If you have seen Interstellar, you will recognise Nolan's willingness to let sound design and music do the heavy emotional lifting in place of conventional exposition.

The principal cast is a polished but somewhat unconventional ensemble for a war film of this ambition. Fionn Whitehead, then a relative unknown, carries the beach strand as Tommy, a young British soldier whose face does a great deal of work in the near absence of dialogue written for him. Tom Hardy, no stranger to communicating beneath a mask (as anyone who sat through The Dark Knight Rises will recall), plays RAF pilot Farrier with most of his performance restricted to his eyes above an oxygen mask. Mark Rylance, one of the finest stage actors working in Britain today, brings a quiet, grounded dignity to Mr Dawson, the civilian sailor who steers his small vessel across the Channel. Kenneth Branagh stands on the mole as Commander Bolton, authoritative and weary in roughly equal measure. Cillian Murphy, another Nolan regular, appears as a shell-shocked soldier pulled from the sea, a performance built almost entirely on stillness and trembling restraint. It is, collectively, an ensemble that prioritises expression and physicality over traditional dramatic fireworks, which is either a virtue or a frustration depending on what you want from the genre. War film fans might also want to compare notes with Hacksaw Ridge, Mel Gibson's rather more visceral take on wartime sacrifice from the year before.

Christopher Nolan’s 2017 epic Dunkirk doesn’t bother with traditional character backstories or sentimental monologues; it simply drops you straight onto the sands with a relentless, ticking-clock anxiety.

The initial beach scenes are absolutely phenomenal, a brilliant display of visual storytelling where the sheer, overwhelming scale of stranded soldiers is communicated without a single line of exposition. Fair play to Nolan for trusting the audience to just feel the dread rather than spelling it out for us, creating an atmosphere of pure, unadulterated survival instinct from the very first frame.

The film’s triple perspective structure (covering the land, sea, and air perspectives over different, overlapping timeframes) is a super interesting narrative gamble that largely pays off. The plane sequences, in particular, are cracking pieces of cinema. Watching the Spitfires glide and dogfight over the Channel, with Tom Hardy bringing a brilliant, stoic intensity to the cockpit, is a masterful exercise in tension. The sound design across the board is genuinely great, turning every bullet whizz, groaning hull, and engine roar into a visceral, chest-rattling experience that keeps you firmly on edge.

However, this highly stylised approach comes with a hefty price tag. I found that the severe lack of dialogue, when coupled with long, lingering scenes of men just waiting on the beach or trudging down the mole, actually makes the film feel like a much longer watch than its brisk runtime suggests. Without deep character arcs to anchor the suspense, the middle act can occasionally drag, feeling a bit like an endurance test rather than a gripping narrative. You’re left admiring the sheer technical craft, but sometimes wishing for a bit more human connection to properly ground the spectacle.

Dunkirk is a highly accomplished, visually stunning piece of filmmaking that prioritises sensory immersion over traditional emotional beats. It is certainly not the best war movie I’ve ever seen, lacking the raw, character-driven punch of the genre's absolute classics, but it remains a uniquely compelling, nerve-wracking experience. Nolan has crafted a brilliant, if somewhat cold, cinematic puzzle that demands to be seen on the biggest screen possible.

Dunkirk sits in an interesting place in the broader conversation about what war films are for. It has no interest in the biographical sweep of a film like Saving Private Ryan or the political texture of something like Atonement, preferring instead to put you inside an experience rather than explain one to you. That is a legitimate and genuinely considered artistic choice, and the film earns real respect for the consistency with which it commits to it. Whether it fully satisfies as a piece of drama is, as the review above makes plain, a more open question. Nolan has made a film that is easier to admire than to love, which is, when you think about it, not the worst thing you can say about a war film. Sometimes a little discomfort is the point.


Rating: ★★★½ | Year: 2017 | Watched: 2026-07-25

View on Letterboxd →


Trailer

▶ Watch the official trailer for Dunkirk (2017) on YouTube


Where to watch

Watch in the UK
Stream:
HBO Max Amazon Channel · Sky Go · Now TV Cinema · HBO Max
Rent: Apple TV Store · Rakuten TV · Amazon Video · Google Play Movies
Buy: Apple TV Store · Rakuten TV · Amazon Video · Google Play Movies
Physical: Amazon UK · Zavvi

Watch in the US
Rent:
Amazon Video · Apple TV Store · Google Play Movies · YouTube
Buy: Amazon Video · Apple TV Store · Google Play Movies · YouTube
Physical: Amazon US

Affiliate disclosure: Movies With Macca may earn a small commission on purchases or subscriptions started via these links. It costs you nothing extra.

Film images and data courtesy of TMDB. This product uses the TMDB API but is not endorsed or certified by TMDB.