Goldfinger (1964)

Share
Goldfinger (1964)

By 1964, the James Bond series was already a phenomenon, but it was Goldfinger that transformed it into something closer to a cultural institution. The first two Bond films, Dr. No and From Russia with Love, had established Sean Connery as a star and Ian Fleming's spy as a viable screen property. Goldfinger went further, codifying the formula that would define the franchise for decades: the villain with a grandiose scheme, the memorable henchman, the gadget-laden Aston Martin, the punning names, the pre-title sequence as its own self-contained entertainment. It is the film that Bond films are still, consciously or not, measured against. Based on Fleming's 1959 novel, the script was handled by Richard Maibaum (a Bond series regular who had worked on Dr. No and From Russia with Love before this), alongside Paul Dehn and Berkely Mather. The story pits 007 against Auric Goldfinger, a gold-obsessed tycoon with designs on Fort Knox and the global economy, and it remains one of the cleaner, more coherent Bond plots, which is not always something you can say about the series. EON Productions and United Artists released it into cinemas already buoyed by the Bond wave, and it promptly became a box-office sensation, recouping its budget many times over and cementing the franchise's commercial viability for the long term.

Guy Hamilton, directing his first Bond film (he would return for Diamonds Are Forever, Live and Let Die, and The Man with the Golden Gun), brings a crisper, more self-aware energy than his predecessor Terence Young managed. Hamilton keeps things moving with a light touch, never letting the film take itself too seriously without tipping into outright parody. Sean Connery is the obvious centrepiece, giving a performance that is effortlessly physical and drily witty in equal measure. He is matched by Gert Fröbe as Goldfinger himself, a villain who works because Fröbe plays him as a man utterly convinced of his own logic (his delivery of the immortal line about expecting Bond to talk, then to die, is perfectly calibrated). Honor Blackman brings a genuine toughness to Pussy Galore that was relatively unusual for the era, and Harold Sakata's Oddjob is a piece of pure physical cinema, menacing without a single line of dialogue worth noting. Shirley Eaton, painted head to toe in gold for the film's most iconic image, appears briefly but unforgettably. For a companion piece from the same period, see also Blood and Black Lace, another 1964 film that understood the commercial power of visual audacity.

The craft on display is polished but purposeful. Ted Moore's cinematography has a clean, bright quality that suits the film's globe-trotting swagger perfectly, all well-lit interiors and sun-baked exteriors that make even the more expository scenes feel expensive and assured. Peter R. Hunt's editing is worth pausing on: his cutting style, particularly in the action sequences, is quick without feeling frantic, and he developed an approach during the Bond series that would influence action editing more broadly (he went on to direct On Her Majesty's Secret Service). John Barry's score is arguably his finest work for the franchise. The brass-heavy orchestrations have a swagger that fits the film's self-confident tone, and Shirley Bassey's title song, arranged by Barry, remains one of the most recognisable pieces of cinema music of the sixties. The sonic texture of Goldfinger, all blaring horns and ominous strings, is as much a part of its identity as the Aston Martin or the gold paint. I also reviewed Point Blank, which came out just three years later and represents a very different but equally stylish strand of sixties action cinema, well worth a look alongside this one.

Goldfinger sits comfortably among the stronger James Bond films, and I say that as someone who has worked through a fair few of them. It is a bona fide classic of the series, the one where the Bond formula clicks fully into place, and even now, decades on, it holds up as a slice of pure entertainment.

Sean Connery is on tremendous form here, effortlessly charming and dangerous in that way only the best Bonds manage, and he carries the whole thing with ease. And then there is Oddjob, who for my money is one of the all-time great Bond villains, or rather henchmen, that lethal bowler hat and all. He is iconic for good reason, a wonderful creation who steals every scene he is in.

The action scenes are good, the plot rattles along at a fair clip, and more than anything I love the look and feel of it. It is gloriously, unmistakably sixties, all sharp suits, gadgets and glamour, and that period aesthetic is a big part of the appeal for me. Four stars. Not quite flawless, but a classic slice of Bond, and one of the entries I would happily point a newcomer towards first.

Goldfinger occupies a peculiar and well-earned place in cinema history: it is the film that made Bond Bond, the template against which every subsequent entry in the series is at least partly judged. Whether that legacy is a gift or a burden to the films that followed it is a reasonable question, but for the film itself, the case is straightforward. What it does, it does with enormous confidence and considerable pleasure. If you have any interest in how franchise filmmaking coalesces into something genuinely durable, this is about as instructive a starting point as you will find. Sixty years on, the hat still flies.


Rating: ★★★★ | Year: 1964 | Watched: 2026-10-05

View on Letterboxd →


Trailer

▶ Watch the official trailer for Goldfinger (1964) on YouTube


Where to watch

Watch in the UK
Stream:
Amazon Prime Video · Amazon Prime Video with Ads
Rent: Apple TV Store · Rakuten TV · Amazon Video · Sky Store
Buy: Apple TV Store · Rakuten TV · Amazon Video · Google Play Movies
Physical: Amazon UK · Zavvi

Watch in the US
Stream:
Amazon Prime Video · Amazon Prime Video with Ads
Rent: Amazon Video · Apple TV Store · Google Play Movies · YouTube
Buy: Amazon Video · Apple TV Store · Google Play Movies · YouTube
Physical: Amazon US

Affiliate disclosure: Movies With Macca may earn a small commission on purchases or subscriptions started via these links. It costs you nothing extra.

Film images and data courtesy of TMDB. This product uses the TMDB API but is not endorsed or certified by TMDB.