Batman Returns (1992)
By 1992, Tim Burton had already proven with Batman (1989) that a superhero film could be genuinely strange and still pull enormous crowds. That first outing had been a cultural event, reshaping how Hollywood thought about comic book adaptations and setting a visual template that lingered for years. Warner Bros., buoyed by its box office success, handed Burton even more creative latitude for the sequel, and the result is a film that feels, in many ways, like the director indulging every odd instinct he had been asked to temper the first time around. Where the original balanced Burton's peculiarities against the demands of a mainstream blockbuster, Batman Returns tips the scales decisively toward the peculiar. It remains one of the more genuinely eccentric products to emerge from a major studio in the decade, a film that seems almost proudly uncomfortable with its own genre.
The production had a budget reportedly in the region of $80 million, substantial for the era, and the money is visible in Bo Welch's extraordinary production design: a Gotham City that looks less like a city than a fever dream of Weimar expressionism and carnival grotesquerie. Danny Elfman returned to score the film, providing a soundtrack that matches the architecture's brooding theatricality note for note. Burton, by this point, had also directed Edward Scissorhands in the gap between the two Batman pictures, and that film's preoccupation with outsiders, deformity, and misplaced longing bleeds heavily into Returns. The script, by Daniel Waters and Wesley Strick, works from an original story rather than a single comic arc, giving the filmmakers freedom to push the material into territory that would have alarmed a more cautious studio (and, by some accounts, did alarm McDonald's, whose Happy Meal tie-in campaign became something of a PR curiosity). The three principal antagonists, Danny DeVito's Oswald Cobblepot, Michelle Pfeiffer's Selina Kyle, and Christopher Walken's Max Shreck, represent a rogue's gallery that is visually and tonally unlike anything appearing in the superhero films that would follow in the next decade. DeVito is buried under layers of prosthetics and black greasepaint to render the Penguin as something genuinely monstrous, a figure more in common with a carnival freak-show attraction than a comic book villain. Pfeiffer, meanwhile, brings a manic, fractured energy to Catwoman that is difficult to categorise neatly, part black comedy, part genuine menace. Walken, as ever, simply is what Walken is, and the film is considerably more enjoyable for it. Michael Keaton returns as Bruce Wayne and Batman, though the script gives him notably less to do than his three co-stars, which is either a bold structural choice or a significant miscalculation, depending on your point of view. If you're curious how this kind of franchise reboot energy has played out in later decades, our review of RoboCop (2014) touches on some of the same tensions between studio ambition and creative identity.
I finally sat down to rewatch Tim Burton’s 1992 sequel Batman Returns, and I didn’t enjoy it anywhere near as much as the brilliant 1989 original. While Burton’s gothic, expressionist vision is as striking and visually sumptuous as ever, the film somehow feels much more unbelievable. And that’s a wild thing to say about a Batman movie, which is inherently divorced from reality!
The suspension of disbelief is heavily tested right from the get-go, particularly with Michelle Pfeiffer’s Catwoman. Her sudden, almost supernatural agility and resurrection feel completely unexplained, lacking any proper narrative background or logical grounding within the world Burton has built.
That being said, you have to give massive credit to the cast, because the performances are undeniably brilliant. Danny DeVito does an absolutely amazing job as the Penguin, delivering a grotesque, tragic, and highly committed performance that genuinely rivals Heath Ledger’s iconic Joker in The Dark Knight. But the script pushes the absurdity way too far. It is just so wholly unbelievable that the citizens of Gotham would actually consider him for mayor, or that his PR team would sit down with him while he’s spewing black drool and eating raw fish innards. Add Christopher Walken’s delightfully slimy corporate villain Max Shreck into the mix, and you’ve got a fantastic trio of actors, but a script that struggles to make their antics feel remotely plausible.
Ultimately, the film suffers from trying to do far too much at once. By shoehorning in two main villains, plus Shreck, the narrative becomes incredibly bloated and loses its sense of real consequence. Because the script is so busy juggling the eccentricities of the rogues' gallery, Michael Keaton’s Batman actually ends up feeling like a side character in his own movie.
To make matters worse, for a superhero blockbuster, there just aren't enough action sequences to keep the adrenaline pumping. Still, it’s a visually gorgeous, highly entertaining piece of 90s cinema with brilliant performances.
Batman Returns is a wonderfully weird, gothic spectacle that’s well worth a watch, even if it leaves you wishing it had focused a bit more on the caped crusader himself.
Batman Returns sits in an odd but not uninteresting place in the canon of early-nineties blockbusters: polished but uneven, ambitious but overstuffed. It is the kind of film that Burton's admirers tend to rank among his most personal work, and his detractors cite as evidence of why he needed a firmer editorial hand. Both camps have a reasonable point. The performances are, by most measures, stronger than the material strictly deserves, and the visual imagination on display would not look out of place alongside Burton's later, more wilfully strange efforts like Corpse Bride (2005) or Alice in Wonderland (2010). Whether that makes Batman Returns a misunderstood gem or a gorgeous, well-cast muddle is a question audiences have been cheerfully arguing over for thirty-odd years now, which may be the most honest measure of its staying power. Some films earn their cult status by being brilliant. Others earn it simply by being unforgettable, and this one, for better or worse, is very hard to shake.
Rating: ★★★ | Year: 1992 | Watched: 2026-06-29
Trailer
▶ Watch the official trailer for Batman Returns (1992) on YouTube
Where to watch
Watch in the UK
Stream: HBO Max Amazon Channel · Sky Go · Now TV Cinema
Rent: Apple TV Store · Rakuten TV · Amazon Video · Google Play Movies
Buy: Apple TV Store · Rakuten TV · Amazon Video · Google Play Movies
Physical: Amazon UK · Zavvi
Watch in the US
Stream: HBO Max Amazon Channel · YouTube TV · HBO Max
Rent: Amazon Video · Apple TV Store · Google Play Movies · YouTube
Buy: Amazon Video · Apple TV Store · Google Play Movies · YouTube
Physical: Amazon US
Affiliate disclosure: Movies With Macca may earn a small commission on purchases or subscriptions started via these links. It costs you nothing extra.
