Genre Drama

The Man Who Sleeps (1974)

Item: The Man Who Sleeps
Rating: 3.0
Author: Ross McLaren

★★★ — The Man Who Sleeps (1974)

The Man Who Sleeps arrived in 1974 as a co-production between French company Dovidis and Tunisian outfit SATPEC, a pairing that was unusual enough at the time to mark the film out as something made well outside the mainstream. At 77 minutes it is brief, almost curt, and it wears that economy like a badge of principle rather than a budgetary compromise. The film is based on the 1967 novel by Georges Perec, one of the more singular figures in postwar French literature and a member of the Oulipo group, whose members built entire works around formal constraints and structural games. Perec's novel was itself written almost entirely in the second person, that unsettling "you" that refuses to let the reader sit comfortably on the outside, and director Bernard Queysanne carries that device directly into the film. The result is something that sits at the edge of what most people would recognise as a story at all. If you have spent time with other French cinema from the period, such as the films covered in my reviews of Little by Little or Mustang, you will know that French filmmakers have never been especially shy about prioritising mood and idea over event, but The Man Who Sleeps takes that tendency further than most.

Queysanne had worked primarily in television before this feature, and the film's origins as a passion project, closely tied to Perec's own involvement in the screenplay, give it the feeling of something made to satisfy a creative necessity rather than a commercial one. The whole thing was shot in black and white on the streets and in the cramped interiors of Paris, and the cinematography has the quality of documentary observation pushed toward something more contemplative and still. It is not a glamorous production, polished but unremarkable in its surface appearance, yet the formal choices feel considered at every turn. The cast is small to the point of near non-existence as a conventional ensemble: Jacques Spiesser carries the film physically as the unnamed student at the centre of the story, present in almost every frame but given no dialogue to speak, while Ludmila Mikaël provides the voiceover, her delivery measured and cool in a way that becomes its own kind of performance. The two never really share the screen in any traditional sense, yet between them they create the film's entire emotional architecture. For a sense of how different 1970s world cinema could be in tone and ambition from what was coming out of Hollywood at the same time, it is worth having a look at my reviews of A River Called Titas and Westworld, two films from the same period that show just how wide the range was.

The Man Who Sleeps (1974), directed by Bernard Queysanne and based on Georges Perec’s novel, is less a conventional film and more a hypnotic meditation on alienation, inertia, and the quiet despair of modern existence. Told entirely through a detached, second-person voiceover (addressing “you” as the protagonist) it follows a young man who withdraws from society, renting a bare Parisian room and attempting to live without purpose, connection, or desire. There’s no plot in the traditional sense, only a slow accumulation of gestures: making coffee, staring out windows, walking empty streets. Yet within that minimalism lies profound emotional resonance. What makes the film so striking is its formal precision. Shot in stark black-and-white with meticulous composition, every frame feels like a still photograph imbued with melancholy. The camera lingers on objects as if searching for meaning in the mundane. The voiceover, cool and clinical, contrasts with the growing sense of existential dread, creating a tension between intellectual detachment and deep loneliness. It’s a film that doesn’t tell you how to feel, it makes you feel it anyway, through rhythm, silence, and absence. That said, The Man Who Sleeps is clearly not for everyone. Its deliberate pacing, lack of dialogue, and refusal to offer catharsis or resolution will test viewers seeking narrative payoff or emotional warmth. It demands patience, introspection, and a willingness to sit with discomfort. But for those open to its wavelength, it’s revelatory. A portrait of disconnection that feels startlingly contemporary, despite being 50 years old. This is cinema as philosophical inquiry: austere, haunting, and deeply human. Not entertaining in the usual sense, but profoundly thought-provoking. Watch it not to be distracted, but to be seen, even when you’d rather disappear.

I find myself thinking about this one more than I expected to, which is probably the most honest measure of whether a film has done something to you. It is not an easy watch, and I would not pretend otherwise, but the films that ask the most of you tend to be the ones that stick around longest after the credits have gone. If anything, the fact that it was made fifty years ago and still feels like it is describing something recognisable about how a person can quietly vanish from their own life says more about the film than any formal analysis could. Some films entertain you for two hours and then dissolve. This one takes up residence.

Rating: ★★★ | Year: 1974 | Watched: 2026-05-06

View on Letterboxd →

Related on Movies With Macca